Floodplain Modelling and Mapping through Spatial Technique
https://scholar.google.co.in/scholar?q=Floodplain+Modelling+and+Mapping+through+Spatial+Technique&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5
ABSTRACT:
Flood hazard is the chance that a flood
event of a certain magnitude occurs in a given area, rural
or urban within a given period of time. The severity of flooding tends
to increase with urbanization. It is, therefore prudent that such a natural hazard is addressed
in a way to reduce the impact it causes on people and the environment. To
achieve the flood river modelling and mapping incorporating spatial technology
and the HEC-RAS hydraulic model. The geometric data needed for the modelling
process were derived from the observed data. Urban
growth within the river basin has the tendency to increase both the volume and
the rate of runoff. Socio-economic impacts of floods depend on the area,
duration and depth of inundation, population density, etc. To achieve the aim
of flood mapping using spatial technology, the
envisaged study incorporating hydraulic model was used. The peak flow of the
hydrograph derived from hydrologic model was used as an input in hydraulic
model for developing flood inundation map. The increase in population and urban
sprawl has contributed to the change in land use as people are converting
floodplains to industrial and residential use. Comparing the LU/LC map of 1992 with
the map of 2013, coverage of settlement area was found to have increased by 14.30%
to 32.54%. Hence, for a
given amount of rainfall, greater flooding is realized. The flooded area was
geometrically overlaid on the Google Earth Image to delineate the affected
buildings and slums. The floodplain area gets reduced due to unplanned development
and encroachment. Flood inundation
mapping of any rural area will be vital for emergency action plans, and
ecological studies. The outcomes can help increase rural flood resilience of
agriculture systems, livelihoods and habitats; reduce the impact of flood
disasters by fore planning.
Keywords:
Flood Modelling, GIS, Flood Inundation mapping.
INTRODUCTION
Nearly 37 million hectares (nearly 1/8th
of India’s geographical area) of fertile land are prone to floods at one time
or another during the monsoon (Valdiya, 2004).
Understanding and assessment of land use change impacts on the watershed
hydrologic processes, is of great importance for the prediction and mitigation
of flood hazards, and also for the planning, sustainable development and
management of the watershed. The study area has contributed to the
change in land use as people are converting floodplains to industrial and residential use. Urbanization in floodplain areas increases the risk of
flooding due to increased peak discharge and volume, and decreased time to peak
(Campana and Tucci,2001; Liu et al., 2004; Nirupama and Simonovic, 2007;
Saghafian et al., 2008). Even though flood is a natural hydrological
phenomenon, human modification and new developments on floodplain had
accentuated the problem. Aim of this research is to produce floodplain map
based on the highest flood level (2005) of the last decade. The development of
the present flood model integrates GIS with the hydrologic model and hydraulic
model. Flood events and water surface
profiles over the length of the modeled stream can be produce by using hydraulic
model. The peak flow of the
hydrograph derived from hydrologic model was used as an input in hydraulic
model for developing flood inundation map. The hydrologic model determines the
runoff and produces hydrograph as output. These hydrographs are given as input
to the hydraulic model and the flood levels are calculated.
THE STUDY AREA
PCMC, Pune, Maharashtra,
located to the North-West of Pune. The latitude of study area ranges from
‘18°33'45” N to 18°43'15” N’ and its longitude is between ‘73°42'30” E to
73°56'0” E’. It is covered by Survey of India (SOI) 1:50,000 toposheet numbers
47 F/10, 47 F/14. The township is situated at a height of 530 m above the sea
level. Three rivers Pavana, Mula and Indrayani flow through this area. The
study region has a typical tropical climate, with three distinct
seasons- summer, monsoon and winter. The Leeward location with reference to the
Western Ghats has made the area’s climate moderate
and pleasant. The mean daily maximum and the minimum temperature for the
hottest month - May is around 40oC and 23oC respectively.
For the coldest month of December the temperature ranges from 30oC
to 12oC. The relative humidity ranges from 36% in March to 81% in
August. Three fourth of the annual rainfall of 70 cm is received during June to
September and average annual rainfall
is 700-800 mm.
OBJECTIVE
OF THE STUDY
The
main aim of the research is conceptualize the flooding pattern and inundation
based on the highest flood level (2005) of the last decade. In addition, this
study was extended to produce land use/land cover maps to understand the change
detection and increase in settlement under floodplain within the study area for
the years 1992, 2013. Furthermore, the velocity grid of flood and the affected
area under agriculture and settlement has been worked out deriving data from
Google map, which gives an idea about damage.
METHODOLOGY
Floodplain analysis was done using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS. Flood maps were generated by exporting the hydraulic model output results to ArcGIS, where they were processed to identify the flooded area. The methodology used in the reported work consists of the following three steps and has been depicted in Figure 2.
METHODOLOGY
Floodplain analysis was done using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS. Flood maps were generated by exporting the hydraulic model output results to ArcGIS, where they were processed to identify the flooded area. The methodology used in the reported work consists of the following three steps and has been depicted in Figure 2.
1. Pre-processing of geometric data for
hydraulic model, using GIS environment;
2. Hydrologic
analysis and Hydraulic analysis;
3. Post-processing of hydraulic model
results and floodplain mapping, using GIS environment. Process diagram for
using HEC-GeoRAS is shown in Figure 1.
PRE-PROCESSING
Set of tools and
utilities provided with the ArcGIS computer package is utilized in the
preparation of spatial data for the hydraulic analysis. HEC-GeoRAS was used to create a geometric import file for
import into HEC-RAS. GeoRAS requires the use of a
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) in the form of a Triangulated Irregular Network
(TIN). Cartosat DEM of 30m spatial resolution has been used in this study.
Terrain TIN
Terrain TIN
The TIN format was used to
generate attribute data for the Hydraulic model files. The contour lines at an
interval of 1 m shape file are used in TIN development. Elevation data
is extracted from the Terrain TIN and it is also used
to locate the floodplain.
Stream centerline
Stream centerline
The stream centerline
was digitized, using the toposheet for reference, from upstream to
downstream. The stream centerline is used to calculate the river stationing at
each cross section.
Bank lines
Bank lines
Bank lines were located at the edge of
the main channel. The bank lines used with the cross-sectional cut lines to
determine bank stations at each cross section.
Flow path centerlines
Flow path centerlines
Flow path lines are used to calculate
the downstream reach lengths in the left overbank, main channel, and right
overbank between cross sections.
Cross-sectional cut lines
Cross-sectional cut lines
Cross-sectional cut lines are digitized
from the left to right overbank (when facing downstream). Cut lines are created
perpendicular to flow.
HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS
HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS
The model divides a
watershed into subbasins. It converts an amount of rain into runoff at exist of
the each subbasin, and routes this runoff along the reaches until the outlet of
the watershed. Combining a basin model, meteorologic
model, and control specifications formed a simulation run. The hydrologic model determines the runoff and produces
hydrograph as output. These hydrographs are given as input to the hydraulic
model and the flood levels are calculated.
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
Several RAS themes were created in the process of developing
the geometric data file for import to HEC-RAS. The peak flow of the hydrograph
derived from HEC-HMS was used as an input in HEC-RAS for developing flood maps. Flood events and water surface profiles over the length of the modeled stream were produced by using hydraulic model. The peak flow of the hydrograph derived
from hydrologic model was used as an input in hydraulic model for developing flood inundation map. Hydraulic calculations are performed at each
cross section to compute water surface elevation, water depth, and velocities. With the companion GIS utility, HEC-GeoRAS, those
water surface profiles converted to flood inundation map.
POST-PROCESSING
Results exported from HEC-RAS were imported into the GIS using
GeoRAS and the floodplain was delineated. Data exported from HEC-RAS included
water surface elevations at each cross section, velocity information at
distributed points along each cross section, and bounding polygon information.
The bounding polygon information defined the extent of each cross section as
modeled in HEC-RAS for the given flow. Floodplain
delineation and velocity data were developed which adhered to the
bounding criterion. Water surface profile data and velocity data exported from
HEC-RAS was processed for floodplain delineation, inundation depth, and
velocity GIS data sets.
Bounding polygon
The bounding polygon information defined the extent of each cross
section as modeled in HEC-RAS for the given flow. During
the post processing of HEC- RAS results, GIS layers for inundation depth and
floodplain boundary were created. The water surface TIN is clipped by a bounding polygon.
Water surface TIN
HEC-RAS is
used to determine the water surface profile for the Mula and Pavana River.
Cross sections, exported from
HEC-RAS and tagged with water surface elevations, are used as break lines to
develop the water surface TIN. The water surface TIN was generated by
intersecting the water surface elevations with the cross section cutlines.
Thus, the floodplain polygon was created by intersecting the water surface TIN
with the terrain surface. The water surface TIN was generated by intersecting
the water surface elevations with the cross section cutlines.
Floodplain delineation
A floodplain polygon is determined by vectorizing the boundary of the water depth grid.
Floodplain delineation and velocity data were developed which adhered to the
bounding criterion. Floodplain delineation was performed resulting in an
inundation depth and floodplain polygon.
Water depth
With
the companion GIS utility, HEC-GeoRAS, water surface profiles converted to the
flood inundation map. The
flood depth map is obtained by subtracting the TIN from the water surface. The
depth of water induced by the flood varied in different parts. A higher depth
of flood is associated with a high discharge, which is a determining factor in
flood-induced destruction of life and property.
Velocity
The simulation produced
variable flow velocities in the main channel and the inundated floodplain. Velocity grids
were developed from the cross-sectional velocities. As
the slope of river increased the velocity of water also increased therefore the
high values at downstream is accredited to the steep slope of the terrain
whiles the low velocities at the upstream can be attributed to the flatness of
the terrain.
LAND
USE/LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION
For
the current research, two Landsat scenes of the study area acquired on 4
December 1992 and 14 December 2013 have been obtained and images were at a
spatial resolution of 90m, 30m respectively. The land use/land cover maps were
extracted from LANDSAT 5 TM, LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS satellite image
and the data was classified using maximum likelihood supervised in ERDAS
Imagine 9.2 software. The image was taken through four stages to generate a
land cover classes of the study area. These include: image pre-processing;
feature extraction; selection of training data (signatures); and selection of
suitable classification approaches. A remotely sensed image was classified
into various land cover types, which is showing increase in settlement area. The
following five land cover and use classes were
obtained; Agriculture, Fellow land, settlement, Vegetation and Water bodies. Following
Comparison of the LU/LC
map of 1992 with the map 2013 was done to understand the land use
change in the study area and to identify the increased settlement along the
river bank and under floodplain. Figure 5 and Figure 6 shows the classified
image with five classes.
OVERLAYING ON GOOGLE EARTH
Flooded area was
geometrically overlaid on the Google Earth Image to delineate the affected
buildings and slums. Settlements along the river bank (2005) are shown in
Figure 8 in which area marked with red color boundary indicates the affected
area of the study region under floodplain of Mula River and Pavana River.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Flooding pattern and inundation based on
the highest flood level (2005) of the last decade is conceptualized. About 6.06% PCMC was under water in hazardous 2005 flood
event. Total area of Pavana and mula drainage basin is 144.44 sq. mile and
outlet discharge of 26 July 2005 was 41642.8 cusec. For 2005 flood, flood level
was defined, which was 0 feet to 10.16 feet which correspond to the peak
discharge of Pavana River and Mula River respectively 27727.9 cusec, 14499.6
cusec. Generally, high water depth occurred along the main
channel and spreads gradually to the floodplains. The inundation map produced
clearly shows the spatial distribution of the flooded area which is located at
areas with relatively low relief. The model results
gave a maximum velocity of 2.25m/s with high velocities occurring mostly in the
main channel. Generally, high velocities were recorded in the main channel than
the floodplains. The spatial distribution of inundation flow velocity of the
catchment shows a correlation with the spatial distribution of the elevation as
low values flow velocities are observed at upstream and high values at
downstream. Comparing the LU/LC map
of 1992 with the map of 2013, fellow land coverage was found to have decreased
by 46.61% to 15.99% respectively, whereas the coverage of settlement area is
found to have increased by 14.30% to 32.54%. By overlying floodplain
polygon of area on Google Earth Image, settlements on the bank of River Pavana
and River Mula are shown. These settlements are constructed in river floodplain,
hence can be affected by a miniature flood event also. Because of increase in settlement along the river
bank threat of flood hazard has increased due to damage related to human and
property loss.
CONCLUSIONS
The
study undertaken depicts the floodplain mapping of the area of interest for
highest flood level 2005 which thrive inside of the extent of inundation in the
area. This when overlaid with the Google map showed the areas under flood
threat. Spatial distribution of flood water for a particular flood event can be
well understood for a rural area thus incepted damage in impact analysis can be
carried out. Thus conserving national property in life the settlements affected
by any flood threat can identify the hazard indication to human and property
and thus remedial measures and rescue operations can be plan well in advance.
This technology will say the prospects in the promising future if implemented
in areas of flood prone.
REFERENCES
1.
Campana, N.A., Tucci, E.M.C., 2001. Predicting floods from urban
development scenarios: case study of the Diluvio basin, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Urban water 3, pp.113–124.
2.
Liu, Y.B., De Smedt, F., Hoffmann, F., Pfister, L., 2004.
Assessing land use impacts on flood processes in complex terrain by using GIS
and modeling approach. Environmental modeling and assessment 9, pp.227–235.
3.
Nirupama, N., Simonovic, S.P., 2007. Increase of flood risk due to
urbanization: a Canadian example. Natural Hazards 40, pp.25–41.
4.
Saghafian, B., Farazjoo, Hassan, Bozorgy, Babak, Yazdandoost,
Farhad., 2008. Flood intensification due to changes in land use. Water Resource
Management 22, pp.1051–1067.
5.
Tate E., D.R. Maidment, F. Olivera and D.J. Anderson, P.E., 2002.
Creating a Terrain Model for Floodplain Mapping. Journal of hydrology
engineering, 7: pp.100-108.
6.
US Army Corps of Engineers.
Hydrologic Engineering Center. 2008. HEC-RAS, River Analysis system, Version
4.0. Davis, California.
7.
US Army Corps of Engineers.
Hydrologic Engineering Center. 2009. HEC-GeoRAS, Version 4.2. Davis,
California.
8.
US Army Corps of Engineers.
Hydrologic Engineering Center. 2010. HEC-HMS, Hydrologic modelling system,
Version 3.5. Davis, California.
9.
Valdiya. K.S., Lessening., 2004.
The ravages of floods. In book: Geology, Environment and society
Universities Press,India, pp.112-115.
No comments:
Post a Comment